
Or that it seems. I tried to enter my full name (which makes up to the big figure of four words) and the system decided it was too much for it. No more than 29 characters are allowed when specifying the full passengers’ names.
It shouldn’t be much of a problem if it wasn’t by this stupid hysteria surrounding flights and security, and the lack of education of some British people which do not understand that there are places in the world where people have more than one name and one surname. Then you show them a passport with the name in full and they get shocked and do not know where to look at, and what is which thing, even if you’re pointing at your surname and saying explicitly: this is my first surname, and this is my second surname. And those two words over there are my name – yes, my name is actually two names.
But they look at you like if you stole your passport or something – even if the photo clearly shows that you are indeed you.
In a way, we could also blame that stupid spanish/catholic tradition (I don’t know if it’s still in use) which dictated that all names to be used in a christening should appear on the Bible and otherwise they should have a biblic name appended at wherever point suit better (whether it was the first or the second name). So most of my generation (and previous ones) ended up with superfluous names prepended or appended to the name that we really use, and we have to revive the extra name for the paperwork.
At the end, the problem is that these long names are unpractical in most of the times. While most of the forms in Spain can accomodate my full name (although not my sister’s, funnily), I still haven’t found any place in UK where I haven’t had to crop or summarise my name somehow.
I must recognize, though, the creativity of the clerks and functionaries is excellent. Within two years here, I have no less than seven variations of my full name, with solutions like:
- abbreviating all except the first surname (feels a bit like american high school movies, like J-C, M-S, etc)
- using only the extra name and the first surname (I don’t use to respond to that name so when people gets to me using it I usually ignore them until I find out they are speaking to me)
- using the extra name and mispelling my first surname (lots of variations on this one)
- using the extra name and the second surname (makes my mum feel proud)
- using first name, first surname (more normal)
- using only the surnames (this makes me feel like being at school again)
But getting back to the point, why didn’t they just limit the maximum size of the form input boxes? Or maybe they could have added one of those nasty and annoying “Allowed characters count” messages which do a countdown while you enter the data until all of a sudden turn the field’s background colour into a bloody red which makes you feel ashamed and cry painful tears of guilt!
It would have been easier and I wouldn’t have had to reenter again much of the info in the dropdowns which as expected, is so much of a pain to fill again when there has been an error, that the programmers decided to not to implement it. I wonder if they are preparing each form manually for a site of such a big size as british airways.
Here in Ireland seems to be different… less creative, they just take the first word as your name (first name) and the last word as your surname (last name). The rest… must be the middle name, who cares?
ouch! i can relate but i have this problem with my address instead of my name. (it’s got a whole lot of adjectives w, pkwy, se, etc). what’s the worst is when a form will allow you to enter everything in but then they wind up cutting the end off when they print a label or whatever so you didn’t even know ahead of time there was going to be a problem.
i have to admit though as a coder i wouldn’t have thought to allow for four names. sounds like a bug in the user! ;)
it’s not just british airways who are so inflexible with regard to names. i have an accented character “í” in my first name and i’ve lost count of the number of times web forms have told me my “name contains invalid characters”. is it really so difficult for the designers of these idiotic forms to contemplate the fact that not everyone in the world has a standard US or UK style name?
“A bug in the user” — it sounds really cruel!
How different would the world be if the dominant software market wasn’t anglo-saxon?
Well, frankly this isn’t British Airways ignoring foreigners, as I know plenty of people with really long English names that would well exceed 29 letters in total. It’s just a crap website.
Although that said, I am unable to enter my UK phone number on the “el Corte Ingles” website because they don’t accept a big enough number of digits and they also don’t let me select the correct type of road I live down. Companies gear their services towards their main customers, on the English language website of British Airways, it’s safe to say this would be the British.
Well, I wouldn’t be that sure about that. There’s a lot of foreign people living in UK, can’t really tell you the numbers obviously, but I read about that somewhere.
In any case, there’s not really an excuse for limiting customers that way, unless they are constrained by old systems and their limitations.