Comments on: WordPress mistery solved! http://soledadpenades.com/2009/05/09/wordpress-mistery-solved/ repeat 4[fd 100 rt 90] Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:18:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: sole http://soledadpenades.com/2009/05/09/wordpress-mistery-solved/#comment-51801 sole Tue, 12 May 2009 09:20:32 +0000 http://soledadpenades.com/?p=980#comment-51801 I think what confuses/bothers/annoys me is that when you reach a line with that comparison style, you then have to temporarily ignore the constant on the left of the comparison, look for the variable on the right, and then jump back to the constant and mentally swap their places so that the classic "if $x equals blah..." takes shape again. I think what confuses/bothers/annoys me is that when you reach a line with that comparison style, you then have to temporarily ignore the constant on the left of the comparison, look for the variable on the right, and then jump back to the constant and mentally swap their places so that the classic “if $x equals blah…” takes shape again.

]]> By: Sandy http://soledadpenades.com/2009/05/09/wordpress-mistery-solved/#comment-51797 Sandy Mon, 11 May 2009 21:15:27 +0000 http://soledadpenades.com/?p=980#comment-51797 At some point, painful as it is, you have to clean out bad habits, even habits you thought were good. I made this change a few years ago, and it has definitely helped me. Just making the chnage itself makes you less prone to the errors, because you immediately notice that 2 can't = something, only ==. At some point, painful as it is, you have to clean out bad habits, even habits you thought were good. I made this change a few years ago, and it has definitely helped me. Just making the chnage itself makes you less prone to the errors, because you immediately notice that 2 can’t = something, only ==.

]]> By: sole http://soledadpenades.com/2009/05/09/wordpress-mistery-solved/#comment-51796 sole Mon, 11 May 2009 15:01:25 +0000 http://soledadpenades.com/?p=980#comment-51796 Definitely! Although I think it's a question of habit: I am used to write it the other way. But of course I recognize it's way better the WP way. I mean - it's IMPOSSIBLE to introduce a bug with that, because the interpreter is going to want to have some serious talk with you if you do it :) Definitely! Although I think it’s a question of habit: I am used to write it the other way. But of course I recognize it’s way better the WP way. I mean – it’s IMPOSSIBLE to introduce a bug with that, because the interpreter is going to want to have some serious talk with you if you do it :)

]]> By: Armando Di Cianno http://soledadpenades.com/2009/05/09/wordpress-mistery-solved/#comment-51795 Armando Di Cianno Mon, 11 May 2009 14:55:00 +0000 http://soledadpenades.com/?p=980#comment-51795 This is a habit I forced myself into years ago when i was programming mainly in C. I'm glad that there are better tools these days that warn one of issues like this, but in the end, if you make the l-value the constant, you're pretty much guaranteed not to make this mistake in languages that dumbfoundingly use the equals sign '=' as the /assignment/ operator. This is a habit I forced myself into years ago when i was programming mainly in C.

I’m glad that there are better tools these days that warn one of issues like this, but in the end, if you make the l-value the constant, you’re pretty much guaranteed not to make this mistake in languages that dumbfoundingly use the equals sign ‘=’ as the /assignment/ operator.

]]> By: pera http://soledadpenades.com/2009/05/09/wordpress-mistery-solved/#comment-51789 pera Sat, 09 May 2009 14:25:57 +0000 http://soledadpenades.com/?p=980#comment-51789 uau muy interesante forma para evitar un tipico error.. aunque es cierto que un IDE podria darnos el warning y listo ;) saludos uau muy interesante forma para evitar un tipico error.. aunque es cierto que un IDE podria darnos el warning y listo ;)

saludos

]]>