Posts Tagged ‘fail’

20090528 Seven: not Apple’s lucky number

My laptop is running Mac OS X 10.5.7 –i.e., the seventh revision of their overhyped operating system– and Apple still doesn’t know how to deal with network issues properly. If it’s not the dreaded “Your wireless network has been compromised” error, it will be this new and absurd behaviour: you close your laptop’s lid, leave it to sleep, come back the next day, open the lid again and… surprise! the laptop is unable to reconnect to the same network it was connected to some hours before! The only explanation: Connection timeout, once and once again.

As you may easily deduct, there haven’t been any changes at all to my router’s configuration, so with all other factors remaining the same, why should it stop working?

Searching for answers to that question unveils a crazy painting spattered everywhere with mystifying cargo-cult affirmations. First comes the number one mac-advice:  repairing permissions, which seems to be the magic fix-it-all for all mac-pains (although it doesn’t seem to be related to anything else than applications which are not properly installed). There’s also the classic it’s not me, it’s you argument, also known as it’s probably a fault in your router’s configuration, and that, as expected when trying to give subjective explanations to an objective fact, can be translated to a myriad of reasons:

  • you’re using { nothing | WEP | WPA | WPA2 } but you should be using { nothing | WEP | WPA | WPA2 }
  • you need to update your router’s firmware
  • you need to select a different wifi channel
  • your router is incompatible with your computer
  • you need to reset your router’s and computer’s configuration and start anew

Obviously all of them are useless, since the fault is not in the router but in the computer itself, miserably unable to rejoin the very same network it was using before going to sleep.

However, since cargo cult is so tempting, solutions multiply, like loaves and fishes. No one seems rational, and worse of all, you feel like there’s nothing else you can do but surrender and try them all, or at least consider them for a second — such is the absurdity of the Mac world:

  • You can’t have Bluetooth activated at the same time than an Airport card. “Then I will need to sacrifice my wireless mighty mouse”, argues another person whose mac doesn’t behave as expected. But Jobs sayeth: “in life, thou shalt need to make choices, painful as they are”.
  • You need to archive and reinstall
  • Or even worse: you need to start from scratch, and reinstall Leopard in an empty disk
  • You need to create a new user, log in with that account and then try to connect to the wireless network, to discard it’s not a problem with the former user account (like if the router had developed a certain animadversion to that user)
  • You need to activate and deactivate Airport (probably inherited from Windows)
  • You need to open Keychain Utility, delete every appearance of your Network passwords, log out and try again
  • Same but restart and try again (very Windows style)
  • You need to remove some arcane com.apple.* property lists from the /Library/Preferences folder. Oh wait, or was it in ~/Library/Preferences? Never mind, log out, or restart, and try again.
  • You need to make sure that System Preferences.app is in the /Applications folder (I would have thought that the main point of bundles was to be able to have apps wherever one wanted to place them, but if this one is true, it would prove another of their magic features false)
  • Then there’s the most bizarre solution of all: open Safari and type in your favourite address. Since the computer is not connected to any network, it will suggest you to run the Network diagnostics utility. Then select Airport, and choose your favourite network name, and it might connect. In fact, I tried this one, and it “worked”, but just once, and I think it was just a coincidence, because the next time I tried, following the very same sequence of steps, it didn’t work again.

And it’s not like my computer’s hardware is new  and the drivers aren’t totally fine tuned yet (Apple is well known by the unreliability of the first versions of each computer model). It is a 2005 PowerBook, which is one of the last models in that family of products, before they got replaced with the MacBookPro. I would expect Apple to know an awful lot about their own hardware — after all, that’s their whole selling point: since we are the ones that build and program it, It Just Works™.

But they don’t seem to know that much (maybe their China assemblers are keeping some juicy bits to themselves), and it just doesn’t work.

20070717 Hey, Technorati, are you going to fix this anytime soon?

Triplicated results in technorati! beat it!

… because this has been happening for a couple of years now and you don’t even reply to my support tickets.

Check my triplicated search results by yourself!

I heard Google’s blog search was a better search engine for blog stuff. What do you think?

Note: I very very rarely use Technorati, since its search results tend to be quite polluted with things like this one. But it is used by Wordpress to show you the latest links to your site and that’s why I’m seeing those threesomes each time I log into my admin panel. And it’s ridiculous!

20060531 Surprise from the past

After patches and more patches, major upgrades and even a new operating system, I have just realized that we still can’t create a folder called “AUX” in windows XPSP2. Well, actually, you can’t create a folder called CON, COM1, COM2, COM3, COM4, LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, PRN or  NUL either.

I wonder if they will fix it in Vista or if that will require Administrator Privileges, pass through six dialogs, a digitally signed certificate and a recommendation letter =))

20060430 Por qué no uso hotmail

Me dicen que me han enviado un mensaje a Hotmail (pensaba yo que la gente había olvidado Hotmail en favor de gmail’s y similares, dado que nadie quiere una invitación de gmail de las muchas que me quedan). Y decido entrar a ver que hay. Y me encuentro esto:

Hotmail SUX

Me divierte la incongruencia: ¡Felicidades, alegría, te hemos borrado los mensajes, tiremos cohetes!

Así que, pregunta al público: ¿por qué seguís usando hotmail?

Y en esa pregunta va otra implícita: ¿por qué seguís enviando mensajes a [mi cuenta de] hotmail, si es posible que vuestros mensajes se pierdan en el limbo de msn?

En mi caso, no he utilizado nunca hotmail, únicamente me di de alta para msn messenger (de cuando sólo se podía acceder si tenías una cuenta de hotmail/msn, etc). Siempre me ha irritado la lentitud y la capacidad de autodecisión que tenía (mandando mensajes a la carpeta de Spam cuando no lo eran, borrarte los mensajes porque no has hecho login en N días, etc), aparte del poco espacio disponible y la asunción premeditada de que los usuarios son inútiles con un ordenador.

Por ejemplo, en los tiempos en que no había gmail, yahoo ofrecía un servicio que no te obligaba a hacer login en un mes, y si no lo hacías, tampoco te borraban los mensajes. De hecho, aún tengo mensajes de hace cinco años en la cuenta de yahoo :-O, y no he tenido que hacer ninguna pirueta para que me los mantengan. Aparte de que, por suerte, he tenido siempre acceso a alguna cuenta POP3 durante estas épocas, así que no dependía únicamente de servidores de acceso gratuito para tener correo.

Y a la segunda, implícita pregunta: siempre evito enviar mensajes a cuentas de hotmail. Hago lo que sea por encontrar cualquier otra dirección de la persona a la que quiero mandar un mensaje, no sea caso de que le pase como a mí y se le borren los mensajes, o mi mensaje llegue a correo no deseado… Incluso me estoy planteando dejar de utilizar la dirección de hotmail como id de messenger para siempre, a ver si a nadie más se le ocurre utilizar esa dirección para enviarme mails.

La gente, la gente es misteriosa. La gente y sus por qués, una incógnita…

20051208 Noxtrum: cómo no hacer las cosas

Busco mi apellido (por aquello de que Noxtrum sea un buscador heredero de páginas amarillas y tal, y aquello del egocentrismo…) e ipso facto firefox me invita amablemente a enviar un report de errores a los desarrolladores. Tras mi negativa, es microsoft el que quiere que lo envíe también, a microsoft, claro está. En otras palabras, el hecho de buscar algo en este buscador hace que el browser se cierre automáticamente.

Vuelvo a abrir la página, echo un vistazo al código (¡sin buscar!) y entre toda la marranada de html me encuentro una función para limpiar espacios cuando el campo de búsqueda pierda el foco, e imagino que es la causante de la super explosión en firefox. Obviamente, tengo mejores cosas a las que dedicarle el tiempo, así que cierro la ventana y me olvido para siempre de este fiasco, que además tardó siglos en cargar y es feo de narices.

Mini-d sí ha conseguido ir más allá de la primera pantalla, puedes leer qué opina acerca de Noxtrum, y más detalles acerca de la poca calidad de la página, también.